Cheshire Tenants owed thousands of pounds by luxury estate agent in Wilmslow” – one headline in the Manchester Evening News last month.  Sadly, such tales of financial mismanagement by letting agents are becoming all too common.

The Manchester story concerns letting agency, Spencer Knight, which has shut its doors without warning, leaving dozens of tenants worried about how they will get their deposits back. The deposits were supposedly insured under one of the government deposit schemes but the insurers have now written to tenants saying that their deposits will not be covered after September 1st.  Angry tenants have been unable to contact the agency owners.

And this is far from the only case of landlords and tenants losing money through incompetent or fraudulent letting agents.   Earlier this year, former letting agent Peter Swatton was jailed for 36 weeks, suspended for 2 years, after fraud investigators uncovered an £85,000 black hole in the accounts of Abacus Accommodation Agency in Wrexham, North Wales.  The money – mainly landlord funds – had been misappropriated by Mr Swatton in an attempt to keep the business afloat after it got into financial difficulties.

Another letting agent, Joseph Newman in Canterbury, left around 70 landlords out of pocket when the business went into liquidation. Liquidators say the agency owes a total of £413,000, including deposits handed over by 250 tenants.

Despite these cases, the letting industry remains almost entirely unregulated.  Anyone can set up as a letting agent and collect money from landlords and tenants; there are no qualification requirements and no experience is needed.

In theory, tenancy deposits should be protected by one of the Government Deposit Schemes. But this too relies on the integrity of the agent in paying money into the scheme or taking out the appropriate insurance.   When tenants hand over their money they are rarely given any form of proof that the deposit is protected.

And landlords are also vulnerable, since rent owed to them is often collected by agents on their behalf. Even if rent is paid directly to the landlord, the first month’s rent may well be paid to the agent when the tenancy is signed, often in cash. All too frequently, there have been cases of agents going into liquidation before the money is paid to the landlord. There is no requirement for an agent to ring-fence the money, or to pay it into a separate client account. There is no requirement for letting agents to insure against such losses.

Is it time for compulsory regulation of letting agents?   Steve Harriott, chief executive of the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, thinks so.  Writing in Letting Agent Today, earlier this week, he expressed his dismay that time and again, “fraudulent letting agents get away with a smack on the hand”.   Harriott argues that if the government is unwilling to regulate, the industry should unite and introduce self-regulation.

Of course, one way of avoiding these pitfalls is not to use a letting agent.  Rent direct from the landlord, missing out the middleman.  Listing a property on RentFair is completely free and we even provide free tenancy agreements for download.  Landlords and tenants can deal with one of the government approved deposit schemes direct.

If you must use an agent, make sure it is a reputable one.  There are now websites offering reviews of agents, which may be worth reading before you hand over any money.  And preferably check that any agency you use is a member of either the SAFEagent scheme, or the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) – both schemes offer assurance that agents displaying their logo have protected their clients’ money.

 

It doesn’t happen very often but, if it succeeds, it can be devastating to those affected. We’re talking about rental scams whereby fake “landlords” con prospective tenants into paying money upfront for a property which does not exist.

The scam usually works like this. The fraudster posts an advert for a property to let on a classified ads website or in the press. The property address may be genuine but it is posted under a fake ID and using photographs usually taken from other property ads. When a prospective tenant enquires about viewing the property they are told that the landlord lives some distance from the property and is happy to arrange a viewing but wants to be sure that he is not wasting his time. The landlord asks for the tenant to prove his/her good faith by transferring a sum of money – usually one month’s rent – to a friend (perhaps another flat mate) by Western Union money transfer. The “landlord” assures them that there is no risk in this because they are only transferring the money to a friend. When they have made the transfer, they are asked to scan the confirmation receipt or email the details of the transaction to the “landlord”, who promises he will then show them the apartment.

In most cases, the fraudster lives abroad and uses the transaction details to withdraw the money from his local Western Union office. We presume he does this by altering the scanned receipt in some way.  Very few checks are required by Western Union to withdraw sums under £2000.

The property, of course, is not owned by the fraudster and the tenants never hear from him again.

RentFair checks all properties added to our site and regularly removes suspicious properties as soon as they are listed. Unfortunately, some are very difficult to detect and we are grateful to two members who emailed us about one such property in Islington recently. Needless to say, we removed the property and “landlord” immediately.  Even charging landlords for advertising makes very little differences since the fraudsters have ready access to stolen credit card details and have no problem paying for services online.

For some time, we have had prominent warnings across the site never to proceed with a property where you are asked to wire money in this way, whether by Western Union, MoneyGram, or any other such service. If in doubt, email us and we will investigate.

The signs to look out for are:

  • fraudsters use addresses that they know are desirable, perhaps to attract potential tenants, perhaps simply because these are locations they have heard of  - Kensington, Chelsea, Islington, Camden, Hampstead are common.
  • properties often seem unusually cheap for the area (if it seems too good to be true…)
  • photographs seem unusually professional – the interior sometimes resembles a hotel room, with soft lighting, cushions on the bed etc.  This may be because the photos are indeed pictures of hotel rooms or show properties.
  • no one answers the phone or the number given is wrong.
  • the “landlord’s” email address is from an easy-to-set-up email program such as gmail, hotmail or yahoo.

If you are at all suspicious about any of the properties advertised, please email us before you proceed.  The scam affects all property advertising sites, as well as printed classified papers such as Loot.  Our thorough checks make RentFair one of the safest places to rent property.  Please help us to keep it that way.

© 2011 RentFair Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Real Estate