A couple of years ago I rented out a four bedroom house in Shepherds Bush to four young professionals – Aussies and Kiwis, who seem to favour that part of London.

They were excellent tenants in most ways – easy going, paid the rent on time, looked after the place well, notified me  of any major problems but didn’t call me when a lightbulb needed changing. The house had a second small reception room, which previous tenants had used as an office and which I had furnished with a desk and bookshelf.

The first time I visited the house, a few weeks after they had moved in, I noticed that the desk and bookshelf had been removed and that there was a mattress and bedding on the floor. Judging by the clothes and other items lying around, someone was clearly sleeping over. When I commented on this, the tenants explained that they had a guest from Australia who was staying for the week.  That didn’t cause me a problem – it was their home and of course they were entitled to have guests.

My suspicions that this might be a little more than a temporary guest were aroused when on two subsequent visits, several months later, I noticed that the mattress was still there. A small portable clothes rail now stood in the corner and some pictures had also been put up on the wall. The number of personal items scattered around the floor had grown.

Although I had no way of proving it, this “guest” seemed to be more of a permanent lodger, a sub-tenant even, no doubt in possession of a set of keys and contributing financially in some way to the rent and other expenses. He or she was not named on the tenancy, I had taken no references from them and I did not even know their name.

Many landlords will have experienced this situation.  And many tenants will have taken on a long-term “guest” to help out with expenses.   It raises the following questions:

1. What rights, if any, does the lodger/paying guest have?
2. Should the landlord turn a blind eye, or insist that the lodger either leave or sign a tenancy agreement?

As any lawyer will tell you, this is a complicated area of the law. Not least, it depends on the circumstances.

One thing is clear:  the guest can not acquire legal rights as a tenant unless the landlord treats him as such (eg by accepting rent payments from him direct).  A Section 8 or Section 11 Notice served on the tenants (for non payment of rent, for example) would cover their guest too, even if that guest is paying rent to the tenants.  The tenants and their guest would have to leave.  No worries for landlords there then.

So should a landlord just turn a blind eye?  Well, in most circumstances that may well be the best option.  But there may be situations where that could leave the landlord exposed to potential legal liability.

For instance, in certain circumstances having an extra occupant may mean that the property falls within the definition of an HMO (house in multiple occupation).  Under the Housing Act 2004, properties of three of more storeys with five or more occupants may be classed as HMO’s and require licensing.  The landlord is responsible for this and their are severe penalties for failure to comply.

And what if council tax is included in the rent?  If a property is let to a single person and that tenant decides to move their partner in, the single person’s discount will no longer apply.  If the landlord is paying the council tax, he/she is then obliged to notify the local authority, who will remove the 25% discount.  The landlord will want to pass this on to the tenant in additional rent, to which they may object.  It would be better to sign a new tenancy at the higher rent with both tenants included.

Similar issues can arise if the landlord is accepting housing benefit.  Additional occupants will affect eligibility and the local authority must be notified.

Even if there are no additional obligations, it may still be advantageous to both parties to regularise the arrangement by drawing up a new tenancy agreement.  From the landlord’s point of view, the guest would then become jointly and severally liable for payment of rent.   A new agreement has advantages for the tenants, too, of course – since they can all then enforce their rights against the landlord if, for example, he fails to maintain the property.

To summarise:

1. A guest or lodger will not acquire rights of tenure unless the landlord treats them as a tenant by accepting rent from them.

2. If the rent is being paid, the best option for landlords may be to turn a blind eye until the tenancy comes to an end.  If the guest is still there and the tenants wish to stay, a new tenancy can be drawn up at that stage incorporating all occupants.

3. BUT landlords should watch out for the situations above, in which long-term guests could result in additional legal requirements, for which the landlord may be responsible.

 

Glasgow GP, Dr Tariq Mahmood, has been ordered to pay nearly £5000 for failure to maintain the gas boiler in a property let to students in Oxford.

A gas installer alerted the Health & Safety Executive after discovering that the boiler was out of order and could potentially expose the tenants to carbon monoxide poisoning.  HSE Inspector, Dozie Azubike explained “every year approximately 20 people die and many other suffer ill health from carbon monoxide poisoning.”

The HSE discovered that the boiler and flue had not be maintained for 2 years. Dr Mahmood pleaded guilty to breaches of gas safety regulations which require landlords to have all gas appliances in rented property checked once a year by a Gas Safe-registered engineer. Tenants have a legal right to demand a copy of the gas safety certificate for their property.

Oxford Brookes Student Union welcomed the outcome of the case.

 Posted by Christian on February 16, 2012 Landlords , ,  No Responses »
Feb 102012
 
Pets need a home too

I need a home too

A recent survey by the Dogs Trust found that many tenants are being hounded out of the lettings market because of the difficulty of finding rental properties which accept pets.  It seems that finding a suitable rental property for your pet requires dogged determination, with over half of people searching for between 2 months and a year before they found the purrfect home.

Of the 5,695 UK pet owners surveyed, one third could not find a suitable property. Letting Agents came in for some biting criticism with nearly half of respondents finding them to be “unhelpful”.

The Lets with Pets scheme launched by the Dogs Trust aims to persuade landlords and letting agents to take a “Pets Considered” approach, rather than rejecting all pets at a stroke.Lets with Pets

RentFair properties have always stated clearly whether pets are accepted, helping owners to find a pet-tolerant landlord quickly and easily without having to make numerous enquiries. We fully support the Dogs Trust’s excellent initiative.  For more information, go to their website:  www.letswithpets.org.uk

 Posted by Christian on February 10, 2012 Agents, Landlords, Pets , , ,  No Responses »
 

Changes to Housing Benefit Rates have been well publicised.  But the new restrictions on single claimants under the age of 35 have received less publicity and are likely to mean that thousands of tenants across the country will be on the move over the next few months.

Caps on housing benefit payments for new claimants came into force in April last year and are being phased in for existing claimants from January 2012.  They are:

  • £250 per week for a one bedroom property
  • £290 per week for a two bed
  • £340 per week for a three bed
  • £400 per week for four-bed and larger properties

The higher rate for properties larger than 4 bedrooms has been abolished.

Less well trailed is the fact that single claimants (i.e. those living alone) under the age of 35 will now only be entitled to the cost of renting a room – the Shared Accommodation Rate (SAR).  Previously, this applied to people under the age of 25.  The SAR varies depending on where the claimant lives. In Central London it is £123.50 per week but it is much less in other parts of the country.  Details of the new housing benefit rates for any postcode can be found here.

There are certain exemptions and the SRA caps only apply to people who rent from private landlords, not those who are accommodated by a housing association or local authority.

Nevertheless, the practical effect is likely to be significant, with thousands of tenants having to up-sticks over the next few months.  By way of example, a 32 year old tenant, living alone in a one bedroom flat in Shepherds Bush, claiming housing benefit of  £225 a week, may shortly have his payments capped at the shared accommodation rate. The SRA for Shepherds Bush is £100 a week.  In other words, his monthly housing benefit payments will be reduced from £975 to £433.  Since he won’t find a flat in Shepherds Bush for £433 a month he will have little choice but to move.  Or –  if he is able –  to find a job and pay the rent himself.

Unlike the main housing benefit changes – which will have the greatest impact in London – the restrictions for under 35′s will have an effect across the country as those previously entitled to rent a whole flat will have their benefit slashed to the room rate for their area.

Many housing benefit tenants are likely to be hit hard by these changes.  But then so are a number of landlords, whose tenants will no longer be able to afford the rent.

Some commentators have made predictions of areas turning into ghettos, with houses and flats divided up into shared accommodation to make room for the expected new influx of under 35 claimants. Is this far-fetched?  Probably.  But there could well be a lot more people returning to live with parents or sleeping on friends’ sofas until everything settles down.

© 2011 RentFair Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha